Sunday, March 29, 2009

Letukka lentää

GM:n pääjohtaja on saanut kenkää Obamalta.  Vuosia vääränlaisia autoja valmistanut General Motors on sellaisessa umpikujassa, etta se selviää vain meidän verorahoillamme (jos silloinkaan).  

On oirellista, että Amerikan suurin ja kaunein on valtavassa talousahdingossa: sata vuotta sitten Amerikkalaiset vaurastuivat halpojen liukuhihna-autojen valmistuksella; kaikilla oli varaa omaan autoon sillä [auto]tehtaiden työntekijät saivat kunnon palkkaa; nyt ihmiset ovat ylivelkaantuneita/alipalkkaisia,he eivät halua/kykene ostamaan huonoja Letukoita tai Chryslereita, eikä amerikanraudat pysty kilpailemaan parempien ulkomaisten autojen kanssa.

Amerikan autotehtailla menee niin huonosti, että  omakotitalojen keskihinta Detroitissa [autoteollisuuden keskus] on 18,000 dollaria!  Joitakin taloja huutokaupataan satasella.  Rappio on syöpynyt jo tosi syvälle.  Ihmettelen vain miksi kansa on niin passiivista.  Ranskassa oltaisiin jo barrikaadeilla...

--- T

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Matt Taibbi on Rolling Stone

Matt Taibbi of The Rolling Stone magazine writes a fascinating article about the big money/power grab taking place by the powerful Wall Street insiders.  I have posted just some parts of the article here.  The whole piece can be found in the link.  I recommend that you take the time read the whole thing!  He writes in such a way that an average person can understand what's going on (for the most part): the bottom line is that we are screwed.  The global financial world has become so complex  it is nearly impossible to understand what is going on.  But it's all for a reason: "Wall Street crowd has turned the vast majority of Americans into non-participants in their own political future. There is a reason it used to be a crime in the Confederate states to teach a slave to read: Literacy is power."

--- T


The Big Takeover 

by Matt Taibbi

It's over — we're officially, royally fucked. No empire can survive being rendered a permanent laughingstock, which is what happened as of a few weeks ago, when the buffoons who have been running things in this country finally went one step too far. It happened when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was forced to admit that he was once again going to have to stuff billions of taxpayer dollars into a dying insurance giant called AIG, itself a profound symbol of our national decline — a corporation that got rich insuring the concrete and steel of American industry in the country's heyday, only to destroy itself chasing phantom fortunes at the Wall Street card tables, like a dissolute nobleman gambling away the family estate in the waning days of the British Empire.

The latest bailout came as AIG admitted to having just posted the largest quarterly loss in American corporate history — some $61.7 billion. In the final three months of last year, the company lost more than $27 millionevery hour. That's $465,000 a minute, a yearly income for a median American household every six seconds, roughly $7,750 a second. And all this happened at the end of eight straight years that America devoted to frantically chasing the shadow of a terrorist threat to no avail, eight years spent stopping every citizen at every airport to search every purse, bag, crotch and briefcase for juice boxes and explosive tubes of toothpaste. Yet in the end, our government had no mechanism for searching the balance sheets of companies that held life-or-death power over our society and was unable to spot holes in the national economy the size of Libya (whose entire GDP last year was smaller than AIG's 2008 losses).

So it's time to admit it: We're fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity. And the worst part about it is that we're still in denial — we still think this is some kind of unfortunate accident, not something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream. When Geithner announced the new $30 billion bailout, the party line was that poor AIG was just a victim of a lot of shitty luck — bad year for business, you know, what with the financial crisis and all. Edward Liddy, the company's CEO, actually compared it to catching a cold: "The marketplace is a pretty crummy place to be right now," he said. "When the world catches pneumonia, we get it too." In a pathetic attempt at name-dropping, he even whined that AIG was being "consumed by the same issues that are driving house prices down and 401K statements down and Warren Buffet's investment portfolio down."Liddy made AIG sound like an orphan begging in a soup line, hungry and sick from being left out in someone else's financial weather. He conveniently forgot to mention that AIG had spent more than a decade systematically scheming to evade U.S. and international regulators, or that one of the causes of its "pneumonia" was making colossal, world-sinking $500 billion bets with money it didn't have, in a toxic and completely unregulated derivatives market.

Nor did anyone mention that when AIG finally got up from its seat at the Wall Street casino, broke and busted in the afterdawn light, it owed money all over town — and that a huge chunk of your taxpayer dollars in this particular bailout scam will be going to pay off the other high rollers at its table. Or that this was a casino unique among all casinos, one where middle-class taxpayers cover the bets of billionaires.

People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they're not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d'état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations.

The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess. And so the gambling-addict leaders of companies like AIG end up not penniless and in jail, but with an Alien-style death grip on the Treasury and the Federal Reserve — "our partners in the government," as Liddy put it with a shockingly casual matter-of-factness after the most recent bailout.

The mistake most people make in looking at the financial crisis is thinking of it in terms of money, a habit that might lead you to look at the unfolding mess as a huge bonus-killing downer for the Wall Street class. But if you look at it in purely Machiavellian terms, what you see is a colossal power grab that threatens to turn the federal government into a kind of giant Enron — a huge, impenetrable black box filled with self-dealing insiders whose scheme is the securing of individual profits at the expense of an ocean of unwitting involuntary shareholders, previously known as taxpayers.

----

That roll of the eyes is a key part of the psychology of Paulsonism. The state is now being asked not just to call off its regulators or give tax breaks or funnel a few contracts to connected companies; it is intervening directly in the economy, for the sole purpose of preserving the influence of the megafirms. In essence, Paulson used the bailout to transform the government into a giant bureaucracy of entitled assholedom, one that would socialize "toxic" risks but keep both the profits and the management of the bailed-out firms in private hands. Moreover, this whole process would be done in secret, away from the prying eyes of NASCAR dads, broke-ass liberals who read translations of French novels, subprime mortgage holders and other such financial losers.

As complex as all the finances are, the politics aren't hard to follow. By creating an urgent crisis that can only be solved by those fluent in a language too complex for ordinary people to understand, the Wall Street crowd has turned the vast majority of Americans into non-participants in their own political future. There is a reason it used to be a crime in the Confederate states to teach a slave to read: Literacy is power. In the age of the CDS and CDO, most of us are financial illiterates. By making an already too-complex economy even more complex, Wall Street has used the crisis to effect a historic, revolutionary change in our political system — transforming a democracy into a two-tiered state, one with plugged-in financial bureaucrats above and clueless customers below.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Narcissism

Narcissism, according to Dr. Drew Pinsky, is what caused us to plunge into the current economic crisis. I agree.
--- T

What impact do narcissistic traits and characteristics have in the face of the ongoing economic crisis? First of all grandiosity and denial are common features of the condition which I think can easily be seen as the two horsemen of the apocalypse that lead us down the path to our current situation. How could we have thought that mortgages would magically be paid when there was no evidence of the basic requirements for this to be so? How could a bank offer such a loan and moreover how could a consumer have the hubris to take on the loan? There were powerful financial motivators to be sure. However to participate in that market required quite a bit of denial and a grandiose sense of invincibility. When one examines the Psychology that allows this to occur you can't help but see the shadowy consequences of narcissism on our society. [Dr. Pinsky]

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Additions

I have added the Rachel Maddow Show on the video bar and in the links.  She rocks!

I have also added the GoodGuide link to my blog.

--- T

Healthy Foods

I found a very good website that gives you information on healthy foods: 

Try GoodGuide.com. The San Francisco start-up is a free, socially conscious, ethical-shopping Web site and is adding a new set of pages to its site devoted to food safety on March 16. The site is the brainchild of Dara O'Rourke, a University of California, Berkeley associate professor of environmental science, policy and management, and it offers more than you ever wanted to know about those mystery ingredients in your cereal, as well as the environmental footprint and the labor practices that go into manufacturing the roughly 30,000 packaged foods found in your local Safeway, Lucky or Ralph's.
[Tim Kingston, Alternet]


--- T

Remembering Molly Ivins



Molly Ivins was my favorite columnist/political writer/satirist, who died all too soon. She would be intrigued to see what is happening in the world today. She'd have some words about the current economic collapse and other madness going on.
- T

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Bonuses

The big fat paychecks/bonuses received by AIG employees is just the tip of the iceberg, I think.

I've been outraged by the unfathomable pay and bonuses by corporate sharks for 15 years. How could someone be worth that much more than anybody else? I was told that they deserve the pay because they bring in so much profit. Well, I think that wealth should trickle down to everyone who participated in the effort...

But now we all know that while they were raking in all of the national wealth they were ruining the global economy. How do they still think that they are so valuable they deserve a bonus?
Wow!
A New York Times article about the bonuses below.
--- T
Bonuses

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Good-by P.I.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer printed its final issue today. More than 145 years of news print will disappear and Seattle will have only one newspaper left, The Seattle Times. Although the Seattle Times is majority-owned by a private family, it too (or because of it), is in trouble financially.

The Post-Intelligencer will continue online, at least for now. But it will be a shadow of its previous self with less serious reporting.

I didn’t like the Seattle P.I. as well as the Seattle Times. It seemed weak and fluffy; but it’s still sad to see a newspaper disappear. I’ve been subscribing to the Seattle Times for many years - although I switched to the P.I. for a few weeks last year, because I was so annoyed by the Times. Now I don’t have a choice.
--- T

Thursday, March 12, 2009

A Show of Solidarity

A great story from Boston Globe that made me choke: a show of spontaneous solidarity that we've rarely seen recently. Maybe things are beginning to change.
- T

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Drug Companies

There have been recent drug company mergers in the news...

What I'm wondering is: will they too, become "too big to fail"? Will the US tax payers have to bail them out too when they overspend?
--- T

Monday, March 09, 2009

Tyottomyydesta viela...

Jostakin luin/kuulin etta oikeasti tyottomyys on taalla jo yli 14%, eli paljon pahempi kuin viralliset tahot kertovat.

Pidan kynsin hampain tyopaikastani kiinni...
--- T

Friday, March 06, 2009

Tyottomyys pahenee

Yhdysvaltain tyottomyysluku on noussut jo yli 8 prosenttiin (8.1). Se on taalla korkea luku, silla taalla ei loikoilla hyvinakaan aikoina. Luku ei myoskaan sisalla piilotyottomyytta, eli niita henkiloita jotka ovat vain osapaivatyossa koska eivat ole loytaneet muuta, tai niita jotka ovat jo kuluttaneet tyottomyyskorvauksensa loppuun ja ovat "kadonneet" kortistosta.

Pohjaa ei tunnu vielakaan loytyvan. General Motors joutuu ehka konkurssiin - sen seurauksena sadattuhannet menettaisivat tyopaikkansa. Ihmiset ovat alkaneet tallettaa rahojansa pankkiin - sinansa hyva juttu, mutta ei auta kun nyt pitaisi kuluttaa. Ironista, silla kulutusjuhla on alku ja juuri tahan kaikkeen surkeuteen.
--- T

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Peter Daou

Peter Daou writes why the democrats should not legitimize their political enemies who are on the fringe; those who hate, lie and get paid a lot of money doing it. I agree.
--- T

I don't buy into this 'brilliant' strategy of elevating Rush Limbaugh in the hopes that it will tarnish Republicans.

Focus relentlessly on the disastrous Bush presidency to tarnish Republicans, yes.
Overturn every single illegal and unconstitutional Bush-era policy and show the country and the world that we're reclaiming the moral high ground, yes.


Implement bold strategies and use soaring rhetoric to inspire Americans, yes.
Hew fiercely to Democratic principles, reassert the greatness of our American identity, demonstrate the true meaning of liberalism, of progressivism, providing opportunity, seeking justice and fairness, helping those in need, yes.


Spend our resources healing the sick, feeding the hungry, lifting the poor, cleaning the planet, rather than on war and more war, yes.

But expand Rush Limbaugh's profile and platform? No.

It's bad for the country and it's bad politics. Limbaugh and his cohorts (Coulter, Hannity, Beck, Savage, and so on), are largely responsible for our toxic political environment. Given major media platforms to launch crude and brutal political and cultural attacks, to demonize liberals, and to use rage as a means of lining their own pockets, these 'entertainers' have poisoned our national discourse.

There's precious little benefit in making Limbaugh more of a central player, in engaging him directly from the White House podium, in raising his stature, in stamping, sealing and approving the years he's spent bashing his political opponents. There was a moment, a brief moment, after Barack Obama was elected president, a moment long gone, where the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity could have become marginalized, bit players rather than media movers and shakers, the detritus of a sorry era. But instead, they have been granted more power -- out of some contrived political calculus. This, at a time when we don't need political calculus, we need single-minded determination to get us out of this economic calamity and to restore sanity to our government.

I know it's hard for Democrats to appreciate how quickly political fortunes turn -- the glow of victory, the high of electoral success gives a sense of inevitability and invincibility, of permanence. But there's nothing permanent about power. The tide will turn again, and the engine that will drive it is the fury stirred by the likes of Limbaugh. Feeding that machine, expanding and enhancing it is a mistake. A serious one.

It's a truism that victory makes every decision seem genius, defeat, the reverse. Democrats, now in power, have a sense of triumph that makes every decision feel smart, every chess move a checkmate. Thus the "Rush strategy" foisted on those of us who have spent the past decade trying to point out how noxious and pernicious Limbaugh and his ilk have been (and continue to be), and how detrimental the anger they've stoked.

Empowering Limbaugh in the hopes of a bank-shot against Republicans will yield the opposite result: Limbaugh will become more powerful, Republicans will relish his increased influence and allow him to do their dirty work.

It's easy to feel like the old era is gone, the old demons slain, that we WON, that nobody's afraid of the once-vaunted Republican attack machine. But Barack Obama's unquestioned discipline, steadfastness and intelligence notwithstanding, he wouldn't be president without a tsunami of Hillary-hatred expertly surfed by his campaign, mishandled by hers, a tsunami generated over the years precisely by people like Rush Limbaugh.

The myth of a technological, grassroots revolution, of prodigious strategic and tactical brilliance, of a do-no-wrong campaign, perhaps the greatest ever run, that myth sounds good, but it's not what happened. The reality was that the 2008 election was the age-old battle of character-building and character-destruction. Obama's team won that battle against Hillary Clinton not just because of Obama's abundant positive traits but because people like Rush Limbaugh gave him a 15-year head start against her. He won it against John McCain because McCain squandered years of character-building by enabling the excesses of George W. Bush and by running an erratic, unfocused campaign that served to highlight the best of Obama's character and the worst of his. Character versus character.

Democratic strategists, busy sparring with Rush Limbaugh, should keep that in mind. The seeds of Democratic defeat are planted not by Republican elected officials, who, like McCain, will carry the Bush albatross for years to come, but by those who can freely fan the flames of outrage, who can fight dirty, who can bend and break the rules with impunity, who can tear down their opponents' integrity and character, and whose apparent reward (as in the case of Ann Coulter) is to be given yet a larger platform.
No thanks.